托福备考有关诚实问题解题思路分享

　　如何用飞行的技巧解决托福考试中有关诚实的问题，来看看一架飞机以及和飞机的故事能够有哪些可以用在托福写作中的素材。托福写作中有一个题目非常让人头疼，就是要不要诚实的这一类，比如说：
　　2017年1月7日的真题：You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or a group. Do you think a person's honest is the most important characteristic for being a leader?
　　2017年5月6日的真题：It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends?
　　这边大家无论在想论点还是想例子的时候都蛮困难的。所以这里我给大家一个简单的例子，仅供参考。
　　911事件之后，飞行安全受到了越发的，以前如果你和空姐聊的开心的话，你还能进cockpit（驾驶舱）看一看，现在如果你问出这句话，结果就是被当成抓起来。所以从安全的角度上看，飞机上是不允许将全部的过程都展现给乘客的。
　　因此，这里我们就有一个段落可以用了。
　　Under normal circumstances, passengers are not allowed to enter the cockpit of a flight so as to ensure the safety of the pilots, the result of which, unfortunately, triggers a problem that passengers would feel upset since they remain in the dark, not knowing what is happening behind the steering wheel. They may feel that the airline is not honest with them, do not trust them, and in turn, they will not trust the airline, either. Yet, provided that the door of the cockpit is open to all passengers aboard, the noise from the cabin, even some violent actions when the flight encounters some delay, would, undoubtedly, disrupt the pilots who need concentration more than anyone, therefore leading to even more insecurity on the flight.
　　（125词，3句，平均41.6）
　　翻译如下：
　　在正常情况下,乘客不允许进入驾驶舱的飞行,保证飞行员的安全,它的结果,不幸的是,引起了问题,乘客会感到沮丧,因为他们被蒙在鼓里,不知道在方向盘后面发生了什么。他们可能觉得航空公司对他们不诚实，不信任他们，反过来，他们也不信任航空公司。然而，如果驾驶舱的门对所有乘客都是打开的，那么机舱里的噪音，甚至是航班延误时的一些暴力行为，无疑会扰乱比任何人都更需要集中注意力的飞行员，从而导致航班上更加不安全。
　　我们来套一下17年1月7号的题目试试
　　观点：honesty is not necessary
　　论点：honesty is not only anunnecessary characteristics, but also a dangerous one which will imposerisks onthe group.例子：It would be much easier to understand if we compare the company to an airline. Under normal circumstances, passengers are not allowed to enter the cockpit of a flight so as to ensure the safety of the pilots, the result of which, unfortunately, triggers a problem that passengers would feel upset since they remain in the dark, not knowing what is happening behind the steering wheel. They may feel that the airline is not honest with them, do not trust them, and in turn, they will not trust the airline, either. Yet, provided that the door of the cockpit is open to all passengers aboard, the noise from the cabin, even some violent actions when the flight encounters some delay, would, undoubtedly, disrupt the pilots who need concentration more than anyone, therefore leading to even more insecurity on the flight.The cockpit is theleader of a flight. When leaders make decisions, they need to calm down and analyze various possibilities and results. If they make their decision-making process public, it is inevitable that someone will disagree with it, which will lead to some improper behaviors, such as strike, and losses of the company.Therefore, in terms of risk reduction, leaders should not show their honesty to their employees completely, thus verifying my claim that honesty is far from a necessary trait of an effective leader.
　　原文翻译如下：
　　如果我们把这家公司比作航空公司，就更容易理解了。在正常情况下,乘客不允许进入驾驶舱的飞行,保证飞行员的安全,它的结果,不幸的是,触发问题,乘客会感到沮丧,因为他们仍然在黑暗中,不知道发生了什么在方向盘后面。他们可能觉得航空公司对他们不诚实，不信任他们，反过来，他们也不会信任航空公司。然而，如果驾驶舱的门对所有乘客都是打开的，那么机舱里的噪音，甚至是航班延误时的一些暴力行为，无疑会扰乱比任何人都更需要集中注意力的飞行员，从而导致航班上更加不安全。驾驶舱是飞机的驾驶舱。当做决定时，他们需要冷静下来，分析各种可能性和结果。如果他们把自己的决策过程公诸于众，不可避免的会有人不同意，这将导致一些不适当的行为，如，公司的损失。因此，在降低风险方面，不应该完全向员工展示他们的诚实，从而验证了我的观点，诚实远非一个有效的必要特质。
　　如果用在不讲leader的题目中，这个例子也是可以的。
　　2017年5月6日的真题：It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends?
　　观点：同意
　　Complete honesty withone's friends will impose danger to the friendship.It would be much easier to understandif we compare the relationship between two personsto an airline.Under normal circumstances, passengers are not allowed to enter the cockpit of a flight so as to ensure the safety of the pilots, the result of which, unfortunately, triggers a problem that passengers would feel upset since they remain in the dark, not knowing what is happening behind the steering wheel. They may feel that the airline is not honest with them, do not trust them, and in turn, they will not trust the airline, either. Yet, provided that the door of the cockpit is open to all passengers aboard, the noise from the cabin, even some violent actions when the flight encounters some delay, would, undoubtedly, disrupt the pilots who need concentration more than anyone, therefore leading to even more insecurity on the flight.The cockpit is you. When youare poundering over something, youneed to calm down and analyze various possibilities and results. If you make your decision-making process public, it is inevitable that your friend will disagree with it, which will lead to some improper behaviors, such as arguments, and deteriorationof the company.Therefore, in terms of risk reduction, friendsshould not show their honesty to each othercompletely, thus verifying my claim that honesty is far from a necessary trait of a healthy relationship.

　　原文翻译如下：
　　对朋友完全诚实会给友谊带来危险。如果我们把两个人之间的关系比作航空公司，就更容易理解了。在正常情况下,乘客不允许进入驾驶舱的飞行,保证飞行员的安全,它的结果,不幸的是,触发问题,乘客会感到沮丧,因为他们仍然在黑暗中,不知道发生了什么在方向盘后面。他们可能觉得航空公司对他们不诚实，不信任他们，反过来，他们也不会信任航空公司。然而，如果驾驶舱的门对所有乘客都是打开的，那么机舱里的噪音，甚至是航班延误时的一些暴力行为，无疑会扰乱比任何人都更需要集中注意力的飞行员，从而导致航班上更加不安全。驾驶舱就是你。当你在为某件事纠结时，你需要冷静下来，分析各种可能性和结果。如果你将你的决策过程公诸于众，你的朋友将不可避免地不同意它，这将导致一些不适当的行为，如争吵，公司的恶化。因此，在降低风险方面，朋友之间不应该完全表现出诚实，从而验证了我的观点，诚实远非健康关系的必要特征。